Discriminating between anonymous PMCs

[michelpons]

I have set up a case where two different Property Packages (PPs) from the same Thermo System are used in a flowsheet. The flowsheet is defined in COFE and involves a co-current heat-exchanger where the process and utility streams are based each on a different PP. It happens that each PP has no name to provide to COLTT so both are known as \"Anonymous\" in the log. It makes it very difficult to figure if both PPs are well addressed by the PME, especially since I chose to have the same compound list in both PPs. I think that COLTT knows somehow which is which through pointers used. So I recommend having an \"Anonymous_1\" and an \"Anonymous_2\" or something equivalent in order to make the difference between PPs.

[michelpons]

Log file obtained with COLTT 2.1

[michelpons]

Case file set up with COFE and CERE PP