Custom Query (122 matches)

Filters
 
Or
 
  
 
Columns

Show under each result:


Results (82 - 84 of 122)

Ticket Resolution Summary Owner Reporter
#37 fixed Name returned by GetComponentName not showing Michael Halloran michelpons

Reported by michelpons, 14 years ago.

Description

I am using the material that helped document Ticket#2. Examining the log (see attached) obtained with COLTT 1.08.4, I observe the following:

PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Call to ICapeIdentification.get_ComponentName PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Return from ICapeIdentification.get_ComponentName - Succeeded

I believe Aspen COMThermo does not return any name for the Property Package. But this does not show up. I would prefer having:

PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Call to ICapeIdentification.get_ComponentName PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : GetComponentList returns : PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Return from ICapeIdentification.get_ComponentName - Succeeded

Then it would be obvious why \"Anonymous\" is used all along.

#38 fixed get_ValStatus improperly logged Michael Halloran michelpons

Reported by michelpons, 14 years ago.

Description

I am using the scenario used in Ticket#21.

When analyzing the log obtained with COLTT 1.08.4 (proii_110609_112126), I see the following for the logging of a get_ValStatus call:

Unit <CO1> : Call to get_ValStatus Unit <CO1> : Return from get_ValStatus - CAPE_NOT_VALIDATED

This is not consistent with the logging of for example a call to get_Value:

Parameter <Check> : Call to get_Value

get_Value returns: 1

Parameter <Check> : Return from get_Value - Succeeded

I think the log of get_ValStatus should look like:

Unit <CO1> : Call to get_ValStatus get_ValStatus returns CAPE_NOT_VALIDATED Unit <CO1> : Return from get_ValStatus - Succeeded

#39 fixed Argument of put_ComponentName call not displayed Michael Halloran michelpons

Reported by michelpons, 14 years ago.

Description

I am using the material of Ticket#28. When examining the log obtained with COLTT 1.08.4, I find the following sequence:

Unit <Anonymous> : Call to put_ComponentName Unit <Anonymous> : Return from put_ComponentName - Succeeded Unit <CO1> : Call to get_ports Unit <CO1> : Return from get_ports - Succeeded

My belief is that \"CO1\" is the name that is put on the UO by the call to put_ComponentName so it would be fitting to have it appearing within the log of put_ComponentName such as in:

Unit <Anonymous> : Call to put_ComponentName ComponentName: CO1 Unit <Anonymous> : Return from put_ComponentName - Succeeded

Note: See TracQuery for help on using queries.