Custom Query (122 matches)
Results (88 - 90 of 122)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #39 | fixed | Argument of put_ComponentName call not displayed | Michael Halloran | michelpons |
| Description |
I am using the material of Ticket#28. When examining the log obtained with COLTT 1.08.4, I find the following sequence: Unit <Anonymous> : Call to put_ComponentName Unit <Anonymous> : Return from put_ComponentName - Succeeded Unit <CO1> : Call to get_ports Unit <CO1> : Return from get_ports - Succeeded My belief is that \"CO1\" is the name that is put on the UO by the call to put_ComponentName so it would be fitting to have it appearing within the log of put_ComponentName such as in: Unit <Anonymous> : Call to put_ComponentName ComponentName: CO1 Unit <Anonymous> : Return from put_ComponentName - Succeeded |
|||
| #38 | fixed | get_ValStatus improperly logged | Michael Halloran | michelpons |
| Description |
I am using the scenario used in Ticket#21. When analyzing the log obtained with COLTT 1.08.4 (proii_110609_112126), I see the following for the logging of a get_ValStatus call: Unit <CO1> : Call to get_ValStatus Unit <CO1> : Return from get_ValStatus - CAPE_NOT_VALIDATED This is not consistent with the logging of for example a call to get_Value: Parameter <Check> : Call to get_Value
Parameter <Check> : Return from get_Value - Succeeded I think the log of get_ValStatus should look like: Unit <CO1> : Call to get_ValStatus get_ValStatus returns CAPE_NOT_VALIDATED Unit <CO1> : Return from get_ValStatus - Succeeded |
|||
| #37 | fixed | Name returned by GetComponentName not showing | Michael Halloran | michelpons |
| Description |
I am using the material that helped document Ticket#2. Examining the log (see attached) obtained with COLTT 1.08.4, I observe the following: PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Call to ICapeIdentification.get_ComponentName PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Return from ICapeIdentification.get_ComponentName - Succeeded I believe Aspen COMThermo does not return any name for the Property Package. But this does not show up. I would prefer having: PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Call to ICapeIdentification.get_ComponentName PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : GetComponentList returns : PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Return from ICapeIdentification.get_ComponentName - Succeeded Then it would be obvious why \"Anonymous\" is used all along. |
|||