Reported by michelpons, 13 years ago.

When a call to the Item method on a Parameter Collection occurs the Viewer displays: Parameter Collection <C01> : Call to Item

Parameter Collection Item takes input argument: 1 Item returns : 1 : 0x129247d8

While for an Item method call on a Port Collection, the Viewer displays:

Port Collection <C01> : Call to Item

Item returns : FEED 1 : Ox12922440

So the input argument is missing in the Port Collection display. This has some importance when the Item method call fails. One does not know for the Port Collection which item has been called.

Reported by michelpons, 13 years ago.

As per the screenshot attached, a GetComponentIds call appears in a weird way in the Viewer. In the original log I see: MaterialObject <Anonymous> : Call to get_ComponentIds

get_ComponentIds returns : Hexane Octane Decane

MaterialObject <Anonymous> : Return from get_ComponentIds - Succeeded

Property Phase Calc Compounds vaporPressure Liquid Pure Hexane

Octane Decane

MaterialObject <Anonymous> : Call to get_ComponentIds

get_ComponentIds returns : Hexane Octane Decane

MaterialObject <Anonymous> : Return from get_ComponentIds - Succeeded

While in the viewer, as exemplified in the screenshot attached, the first getComponentIds tag is not yet expanded that its contents are already displayed. One should need always to expand in order to see the contents of the call.

Reported by michelpons, 14 years ago.

While re-testing case 09-008 (also known as TRAC ticket #15), I have reviewed the log obtained (see attached). I am not satisfied with the logging of the GetCompoundConstant call:

PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Call to GetCompoundConstant

GetCompoundConstant takes Input Arguments:

Property Compounds

GetCompoundConstant returns:

Property Compounds ValueReturned

PropertyPackage <Anonymous> : Return from GetCompoundConstant - Succeeded

I can't tell from the log if there is no property listed and/or no compound listed. May be there is nothing in both arguments but this is not obvious from the message. It should be more explicit.